<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>diversity Archives - Woman Endangered</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.womanendangered.org/tag/diversity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.womanendangered.org/tag/diversity/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2022 06:18:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Amelia Earhart &#8211; Girl who walked alone</title>
		<link>https://www.womanendangered.org/girl-who-walked-alone/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Uday Kumar Varma]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2021 06:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Expert Speak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Get Inspired]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guest Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trending Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WE Tell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender equity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inclusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[we tell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[woman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women in leadership]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.womanendangered.org/?p=1982</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>‘He who has a why to live for Can bear almost any how” -Nietzsche The world has seen innumerable brave and courageous men and women who have in the face of impossible situations defied death, even conquered it. But there are only a few whose spirit for adventure is so overwhelming that they choose to [...]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.womanendangered.org/girl-who-walked-alone/">Amelia Earhart &#8211; Girl who walked alone</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.womanendangered.org">Woman Endangered</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>‘He who has a why to live for Can bear almost any how”</p>



<p>-Nietzsche</p>



<p>The world has seen innumerable brave and courageous men and women who have in the face of impossible situations defied death, even conquered it. But there are only a few whose spirit for adventure is so overwhelming that they choose to embrace certain extinction in possession of a passion they hold supremely satisfying and sublimating. Life for them is a perpetual pursuit of a continuously exciting and constantly engaging enticement, it is a dream whose actualization fuels their determination and dictates their craft and conscience. Adventure is their lifeline, fearlessness their DNA.</p>



<p>There could not be a better and more illuminating example of this ilk than Amelia Earhart.</p>



<p>Amelia Earhart resides in the heart of people not because she was an aviator who set many flying records, not because she championed the advancement of women in aviation, not because she set her heart on things belonging to men’s exclusive preserve, though her list of accomplishments is long and distinguished, actually exceptional. &nbsp;She is dear to people because she displayed an indomitable spirit in pursuit of her life’s purpose and passion. She attempted and accomplished successfully all that was deemed impossible in domains far removed from the imagination of the women of her times.</p>



<p><strong>Missing for 85 years but not forgotten</strong></p>



<p>She became the first woman to fly solo across the Atlantic Ocean, and the first person ever to fly solo from Hawaii to the U.S. mainland. During a flight to circumnavigate the globe, Earhart disappeared somewhere over the Pacific in July 1937. She was to complete 40 springs of her life only two weeks away. Her plane wreckage was never found, and she was officially declared lost at sea after a year and a half in March 1939. &nbsp;Her disappearance remains one of the greatest unsolved mysteries of the twentieth century.</p>



<p><strong>Early Life</strong></p>



<p>Born in Atchison, Kansas on July 24, 1897, she defied all that was traditional and embraced everything so atypical of women of her times. Earhart’s tryst with flying, destined to bring her immortal fame and glory began in California in December 1920 when she took her first airplane ride with famed World War I pilot Frank Hawks—and was forever hooked. In January 1921, she started flying lessons with female flight instructor Neta Snook. Later that year, she purchased her first airplane, a second-hand Kinner Airster and nicknamed it “the Canary.” Earhart passed her flight test in December 1921, earning a National Aeronautics Association license. Two days later, she participated in her first flight exhibition at the Sierra Airdrome in Pasadena, California.</p>



<p><strong>Record heights</strong></p>



<p>Earhart’s first record came in 1922 when she became the first woman to fly solo above 14,000 feet. In 1932, Earhart became the first woman (and second person after Charles Lindbergh) to fly solo across the Atlantic Ocean. She left Newfoundland, Canada, on May 20 in a red Lockheed Vega 5B and arrived a day later, landing in a cow field near Londonderry, Northern Ireland. Upon returning to the United States, Congress awarded her the Distinguished Flying Cross—a military decoration awarded for “heroism or extraordinary achievement while participating in an aerial flight.” She was the first woman to receive the honour.</p>



<p>Later that year, Earhart made the first solo, nonstop flight across the United States by a woman. She started in Los Angeles and landed 19 hours later in Newark, New Jersey. She also became the first person to fly solo from Hawaii to the United States mainland in 1935.</p>



<p>Between 1930 and 1935, Earhart had set seven women&#8217;s speed and distance aviation records in a variety of aircraft, including the Kinner Airster, Lockheed Vega, and Pitcairn Autogiro. By 1935, recognizing the limitations of her &#8220;lovely red Vega&#8221; in long, transoceanic flights, Earhart contemplated, in her own words, a new &#8220;prize &#8230; one flight which I most wanted to attempt – a circumnavigation of the globe as near its waistline as could be&#8221;.</p>



<p><strong>Experimental</strong></p>



<p>She was a maverick, an iconoclast, who loved demolishing traditional images of women. She was also a loner. A 1915 college yearbook caption captured the essence of her character, &#8220;A.E. – the girl in brown who walks alone&#8221;. Her restlessly wandering yet extraordinarily resolute mind took her through several experiments and experiences in life, sampling and savouring diverse tastes of adventure. In 1935, Earhart became a visiting faculty member at Purdue University as an advisor to aeronautical engineering and a career counsellor to women students. She became a member of the National Woman&#8217;s Party and a pioneer supporter of the Equal Rights Amendment. &nbsp;In 1929, after placing third in the All-Women’s Air Derby—the first transcontinental air race for women—Earhart helped to form the Ninety-Nines, an international organization for the advancement of female pilots. She became the first president of the organization of licensed pilots, which still exists today and represents women flyers from 44 countries.</p>



<p><strong>Rebel</strong></p>



<p>If she was notably unorthodox in her professional, she was as much of a defiant rebel in her personal life. She married a publisher George P. Putnam, a divorcee himself with two sons from his previous marriage after he proposed six times to her. Earhart referred to her marriage as a &#8220;partnership&#8221; with &#8220;dual control&#8221;. In a letter written to Putnam and hand-delivered to him on the day of the wedding, she wrote, &#8220;I want you to understand I shall not hold you to any midaevil (<em>sic</em>) code of faithfulness to me nor shall I consider myself bound to you similarly.&#8221; She continued, &#8220;I may have to keep someplace where I can go to be by myself, now and then, for I cannot guarantee to endure at all times the confinement of even an attractive cage.” Evidently, Earhart&#8217;s ideas on marriage were liberal for the time, as she pointedly kept her own name rather than being referred to as &#8220;Mrs Putnam&#8221;. There was no honeymoon for the newlyweds, as Earhart was involved in a nine-day cross-country tour promoting autogyros and the tour sponsor, Beech-Nut chewing gum.</p>



<p>But her marriage further strengthened, whetted and refined her passion of flying. Putnam not only shared her dreams but actively helped her plan and execute them. The understanding they shared matured and flourished. He taught her how to present her ambitions and accomplishments to the world at large. Following her disappearance over the Pacific and not being satisfied with the Roosevelt administration’s efforts to find her, he commissioned a private search that unfortunately did not yield any success.</p>



<p><strong>Around the World</strong></p>



<p>In pursuance of her dream, Amelia Earhart took off from Oakland, California, on an eastbound flight around the world. The date was Ist of June, 1937. It was her second attempt to become the first pilot ever to circumnavigate the globe. She flew a twin-engine Lockheed 10E Electra and was accompanied on the flight by navigator Fred Noonan. They flew to Miami, then down to South America, across the Atlantic to Africa, then east to India and Southeast Asia. The pair reached Lae, New Guinea, on June 29. When they reached Lae, they already had flown 22,000 miles. They had 7,000 more miles to go before reaching Oakland and fulfilling her long-cherished dream.</p>



<p><strong>Missing in Action</strong></p>



<p>Earhart and Noonan departed Lae for tiny Howland Island—their next refuelling stop—on July 2. It was the last time Earhart was seen alive. She and Noonan lost radio contact with the U.S. Coast Guard cutter ‘Itasca’, anchored off the coast of Howland Island, and disappeared en route.</p>



<p>President Franklin D. Roosevelt authorized a massive two-week search for the pair, but they were never found. On July 19, 1937, Earhart and Noonan were declared lost at sea.</p>



<p>Scholars and aviation enthusiasts have proposed many theories about what happened to Amelia Earhart. The Crash and Sink Theory, the most prevalent one, suggested that Earhart’s plane ran out of fuel while she searched for Howland Island, and crashed into the sea and perished. Another theory hints that she may have landed in a neighbouring island, the Gardner Island, now called Nikumaroro having failed to locate Howland Island, where they may have survived for some time before dying. There are other fanciful theories as well. One such theory mentions that she was captured by the Japanese and executed while another equally fanciful theory is that they worked as spies for the Roosevelt administration and lived under new identities on their return to the US. Her disappearance, even after decades, continues to arouse interest and excitement and is one of the most controversial unsolved mysteries. The official position, however, is that her plane crashed into the sea near Howland Island possibly because the plane ran out of fuel or due to navigational errors. While the controversy is still alive, she still remains the <strong>most wanted missing person</strong>.</p>



<p><strong>Legacy</strong></p>



<p>Earhart became an acclaimed international celebrity at an early age during her own lifetime. Her charismatic appeal is accentuated by her shyness, steely resolution, fierce independence, dogged persistence and death-defying determination combined together in her rare personality. Her mystifying disappearance and the circumstances leading to it lent a lasting lustre to her legacy and a glowing hue to her uncommon accomplishments. She has been discussed and eulogised in hundreds of articles. Scores of books have been written about her life as a motivational tale for everyone, especially for girls. Hailed as one of the brightest feminist icons, Hillary Clinton in a 2012 memorial address said, &#8220;Earhart &#8230; created a legacy that resonates today for anyone, girls and boys, who dream of the stars.</p>



<p>Earhart, even after over eight decades of disappearance towers tall in defiance of death. There are people who still believe that she did not perish in the sea. Her iconic legacy has only become richer and more enduring with the passage of time. She is remembered as a fearless intrepid courageous person of outstanding grit and determination. But, above all, she is part of a treasured heritage nurtured by young women across the world for leading a life that was not only eminently successful but exceptionally inspirational. She lived with passion and purpose each day of her life.</p>



<p>“Once more into the fray</p>



<p>Into the last good fight, I’ll ever know</p>



<p>Live and die on this day</p>



<p>Live and die on this day”</p>



<p><em><em>Women have often been neglected as major contributors to the history of the world either through commission or distortion. It&#8217;s a delight for us to have taken on the challenge to unearth these overlooked gems and keep relevant the stories of amazing women in history.</em></em></p>



<p><em>The author was the former Information and Broadcasting Secretary, GOI. Mr Uday Kumar Varma serves as an esteemed jury member on the <a href="http://sabera.co/">SABERA</a> The Social and Business Enterprise Responsible Awards 2021 <a href="https://www.sabera.co/uday-kumar-varma/">Jury Board</a>.</em></p>



<p><em>This article is </em>part of a<em> series on women in history who have excelled in their area of passion. You may also like to read about the activist <a href="http://www.womanendangered.org/right-for-women-to-vote/">Emmeline Pankhurst</a> from England or the lady sniper <a href="http://www.womanendangered.org/lady-death/">Lyudmila Pavlichenko</a> or just maybe a piece on<a href="http://www.womanendangered.org/passion-thy-name-is-frida-kahlo/"> Frida Kahlo</a>?</em></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.womanendangered.org/girl-who-walked-alone/">Amelia Earhart &#8211; Girl who walked alone</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.womanendangered.org">Woman Endangered</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is India a patriarchal society? Youth Survey</title>
		<link>https://www.womanendangered.org/india-primarily-patriarchal-society/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Suparnaa Chadda]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2016 07:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Eye Openers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patriarchal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youth]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.womanendangered.org/?p=1323</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Introduction The aim behind writing this paper and subsequent survey is based on a hunch hypothesis of Indian being a patriarchal society. The reasoning for this assumption is reinforced at various stages through our current social fabric. It echoes in the public domain with innumerable news items, which reflects the patriarchal nature of Indian society. [...]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.womanendangered.org/india-primarily-patriarchal-society/">Is India a patriarchal society? Youth Survey</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.womanendangered.org">Woman Endangered</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="article-content">
<div class="article-body" dir="ltr">
<p><strong>Introduction</strong></p>
<p>The aim behind writing this paper and subsequent survey is based on a hunch hypothesis of Indian being a patriarchal society. The reasoning for this assumption is reinforced at various stages through our current social fabric. It echoes in the public domain with innumerable news items, which reflects the patriarchal nature of Indian society. Startling figures from the NCRB (National Crime Research Bureau) clearly exhibit the reigns of gender inequality running deep in our society. Not only through extreme events of sexual violence or dowry deaths but also in task distribution through rice plantations to state an example, where the most labor intensive work of weeding and transplanting is delegated to women. And through instances where women are paid heed and used only as a proxy to their male counter parts. For example, Rabri Devi through the last Lok Sabha elections served as proxy to Lalu Prasad, who was barred to contest post his arrest in the fodder scam, similar to when she played proxy between 1997 and 2005 while he served sentence in jail for embezzlement. Yet another example can be the woman councillor seats that are reserved in Delhi where women participate only as a proxy to their husband <em>1</em>. Sadly, this is just the beginning of the story gender inequality. In this paper, WE aims to investigate the ideas, opinions and viewpoints of the youth (below 30) regarding gender roles, thereby analyzing the constraints that women face both at home and work.</p>
<p><strong>Background</strong></p>
<p>To trace the existence of patriarch or an unequal representation of women, the French feminist movement through the French revolution is a good example in history. In 1791 Olympe de Gouges published the Declaration of the Rights of Woman and the Female Citizen. This was a letter addressed to Queen Marie Antoinette which requested actions in favor of women’s rights. Gouges was guillotined two years later. The constant appropriation of a positive role for men and the opposite for women almost seems to be done to a design. One evolutionary sociobiological theory for the origin of patriarchy begins with the view that females almost always invest more energy into producing offspring than males and, as a result, females are a resource over which males compete. This theory is known as the Bateman’s principle. One important female preference in selecting a mate is which males control more resources to assist her and her offspring. This, in turn, causes a selection pressure on men to be competitive and succeed in gaining resources in order to compete with other men. However, the patriarchal mindset may have been a metamorphosis through. If we notice among Christian names the existence of a matrilineal society (lineage from the mother) reflects the lineage. For example, ‘Mathew Doris’ where Mathew is a man’s name and Doris a woman’s name which in all probability comes from the mother. Some Scottish names are distinctly matrilineal; take for instance Mac Beth where Mac literally means ‘son of’ and ‘Beth’ a female name, hence, literally translates to son of Beth. The Irish names like O‘Connor also have a similar connotation ‘Son of Connor’ where ‘Connor’ is a female name.</p>
<h6><em>1 Case in this regard is of Neetu Chaudhary MCD Councillor, Ward No 208, Sarita Vihar, New Delhi</em></h6>
<p>In the Indian subcontinent too some sections like the khasis tribe from the North East depict matrilineal and matriarchal (mother as rank of the head where arch symbolizes power) leanings.</p>
<p>‘According to the Guinness Book of Records, the hilly Indian state of Meghalaya is the rainiest place on earth. And in its tribal populations, it also boasts of one of the world’s few surviving matrilineal systems &#8211; where women, rather than men, own land and property. Tradition dictates that the youngest daughter in the family inherits all the property as well as acting as caretaker of aged parents and unmarried siblings. As for the Meghalaya men folk, a suffragette movement has sprung up, with men’s right groups claiming matrilineal culture is breeding generations of gents who fall short of their potential, subsequently slipping into alcoholism and drug abuse.’</p>
<p>According to a blog penned by Nita J Kulkarni ‘traditionally, in Kerala it was communities like the Nairs and Ezhavas and Warriers and in Meghalaya it’s the the Khasi, Jaintias and Garo tribes (majority of the population of Meghalaya) who practice or used to practice this system. The Tulus in Karnataka have also been known to be traditionally matrilineal. However, the matrilineal system has declined considerably.’ Deifying women through the Shakti movement is another example of the importance of ‘Mother’ in the system that corroborates the exalted power of female in society. ‘The Shakti movement is one of the major theological dynamics in Hinduism. Its ideology is a supreme mother goddess phenomenon common in many primal religions. A tradition of Goddess worship may be traced as far back as the Indus valley, where presence of numerous terracotta figurines found at all levels of excavations suggests a general concern or fertility and that the worship of female divinity was a popular feature of the Indus religiousity’.</p>
<p>What is interesting to know is that ‘matrimonial’ unlike what it refers to in the present context of marriage actually meant the inheritance from the mother. So, even though the structure of the lineage, power and inheritance exists, patriarchy seems to have taken over at some point in time. The misogynistic attitude finds reflection through the cuss words too that may reflect a woman as honour and to violate her as dishonouring the person against whom the angst is felt. It is symptomatic of a feudal/patriarchal mindset where the woman is used to settle scores. Misandry on the other hand is still a word popularly unknown.</p>
<p>Also, the tilt of the power balance can hurt either of the genders as is evident in Meghalaya today. According to Keith Pariat, President of Syngkhong-Rympei-Thymmai, Meghalaya’s very own men’s rights movement says that they ‘do not want to bring women down’<em>2</em> but ‘want to bring the men up to where the women are.’ Pariat, who ignored age-old customs by taking his father’s surname is adamant that matriliny is breeding generations of Khasi men who fall short of their inherent potential, citing alcoholism and drug abuse among its negative side-effects. Matriliny breeds a culture of men who feel useless, he adds. Citing numerous examples of how his fellow brethren are being demoralized, he talks of a fascinating theory involving the way where gender in the local Khasi language reflects these basic cultural assumptions. For example, a tree is masculine, but when it is turned into wood, it becomes feminine. The same is true of many of the nouns in our language. When something becomes useful, its gender becomes female, he states.</p>
<p>Hence, for a truly inclusive and gender equal society the power struggle needs to come to an equilibrium if not eliminated altogether. Typically, sexism is thought of as hostility towards women, perpetrated by men. However, both women and men can (and often do) endorse sexist beliefs about each other and themselves. In other words, men can express sexist attitudes about women or men, and women can express sexist attitudes about men or women. While sexism has historically disadvantaged women, there are negative consequences of sexism for both men and women Rigid gender roles can be damaging to women and men alike, restricting opportunities and promoting gender-based prejudice.’ <em>3</em></p>
<p>The gender roles as they are perceived today through reinforcement over the years seem to have metamorphosed into a power struggle. With child bearing and raring being a mother’s prerogative (naturally due to biology) an economic value may not be assigned to the same. However, the erstwhile male gender role of hunting or ploughing has been replaced with providing for the family which has an economic value attached to it. The lopsided scale of economics may have lead to a power struggle with the patriarchal subjugation creeping in. The hierarchy being further challenged with an increased representation of women in the workforce. The positions at home and at work being continually interchanged leading to frustration, confusion and anger.</p>
<ol>
<li><em>As per an interview given to Timothy Allen of BBC</em></li>
<li><em>This is also described as ambivalent sexism</em>.</li>
</ol>
<p><strong>Survey Methodology</strong><br />
We floated a survey to address the mindset relating to gender role and responsibilities amidst the youth (30 and under). The questions designed through the survey aimed to touch upon issues such as participation of women in decision making at home and their representation at work. While question 1 and 2 segregates the surveyed as per age and gender, question 3 also includes the orientation beyond the conventional gender segregation to recognize and create an inclusive forum for any gender sensitivity platform. Questions 6, 7, 8 and 9 deal directly with patriarchy and gender roles assigned. Questions 10 to 14 aim to tabulate the issues dealt with woman and work. Questions 15 to 17 identify the nature of reaction of the surveyed in case of being a witness to violations. Question 18 addresses the deeply engrained tradition that has a patriarchal trend. Question 19 aims to assess the inclination of the surveyed to be an active participant for change. Finally, question 20 ranks the role that media plays on gender discrimination.</p>
<p>To access the survey questions &amp; its results<a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BweWU0LE4A0tY2I5ZTczZTYtOWQ4ZS00YTVkLWFlOGEtMGUzOWU5MDQzMjMx/view?usp=sharing" target="_blank"> click here</a></p>
<p><strong>References and Bibliography</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>National Crime Records Bureau, Ministry of Home Affairs http://ncrb.nic.in/CD-CII2012/cii-2012/Chapter%205.pdf last accessed on January 30, 2014</li>
<li>The Origins of Patriarchy https://www.boundless.com/sociology/understanding-gender-stratificationand-inequality/women-as-a-minority/the-origins-of-patriarchy/ last accessed on January 30, 2014</li>
<li>Where Women Rule the World: Matriarchal Communities From Albania to China (http://metro.co.uk/2013/03/05/where-women-rule-the-world-matriarchalcommunities-from-albania-to-china-3525234/ last accessed on January 30, 2014)</li>
<li>Kulkarni N, Are (or were) Meghalaya and Kerala Matriarchal Societies? (http://nitawriter.wordpress.com/2008/03/19/meghalaya-and-kerala-statusof-women/ last accessed on January 30, 2014</li>
<li>Meghalaya, India: Where women rule, and men are suffragettes http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-16592633 last accessed on January 30, 2014 Religions of the World, Second Edition: A Comprehensive Encyclopedia of Beliefs and Practices</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<div class="article-footer"></div>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.womanendangered.org/india-primarily-patriarchal-society/">Is India a patriarchal society? Youth Survey</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.womanendangered.org">Woman Endangered</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
